Sexual Health, Reproductive
brief analysis of the "Draft Law on Sexual Health, Reproductive and Maternal and Perinatal"
In all the interviews Carlos Filizzola argues that the bill has the ultimate goal is "p revention and assistance to victims of offenses against sexual autonomy." However, many sectors of society have spoken strongly against this proposal, seeing it as a "pre-law" to move toward further concessions on abortion and gay marriage.
Senator Carlos Filizzola denies that his bill could give rise to gay marriage and abortion, arguing that this should change the constitution. However, document of the Bill contains many ambiguities that can be interpreted in one way or another. Some of them referred specifically to homosexual marriage, and this would already be enough to start a constitutional process.
The project's proponents say they defend. "That is not what we want, but this," Well, if that other is what they want to promote, which incidentally is very fair - it seems - is essential to use terms and expressions ambiguities accurate and not likely to give rise to interpretations misleading and improper.
By making this simple analysis, I will not cover my Catholic faith, because this is one law for all and, in our country guarantees freedom of worship, I can not impose Christian criteria for all to follow, but I can claim common criteria for the dignity judicious intrinsic nature of man.
then expose some of the controversial articles and my particular objections. These objections do want them to start from a philosophical, anthropological and moral that I think may be of common heritage between all the inhabitants of this country, and any sensible person.
Article 6: is acknowledged as a right to sexual health, the full realization of personal sexuality falls within the principles of the right to autonomy and integrity: the right to privacy and right to freedom of sexual choice.
is abolished any practice involving sex discrimination or sexual preference.
Questioning:
analyzing the meaning of this story from the viewpoint of syntactic I simplify it like this: is acknowledged as a right: the right to privacy and right to self sexual preference . It was necessary to disguise the intent of placing homosexuality release after so much gloss and after an obvious right of privacy.
There
free sexual choice, since this is not chosen, was born with a defined sexual nature that may result to a simple choice. This refers to the principle called "gender perspective" that will develop later.
regard to paragraph 2, these practices include: the prohibition of the Catholic Church to exercise the priesthood of homosexuals and access to Eucharistic communion to those that also have this tendency, the exercise (I had to forcibly make this reference to the Catholic faith because this aspect is perhaps the most persecuted .)
Article 8: The prescription of any contraceptive method requires the free consent of the client / o.
Where choice and irreversible surgical methods of contraception, you will need information and advice, ensuring the state full consciousness and awareness of the scope, and consequences of this election.
be mandatory in such cases the written consent of the patient must be an adult. In cases of incapacity, the consent may be the legal representative, which must have judicial authorization.
Questioning:
The "inability" of paragraph 3 also includes the lack of majority. If so, parents may decide on any form of sterilization or to even abortion for their minor daughters.
12: During pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum women are entitled to:
c) Clear explanations and accurate information on the development of the state as his child, and to decide freely on the alternatives according to the situation that arises.
Questioning:
What alternatives do you mean? What more choices regarding to "reproductive health" could be for a child already conceived and pregnancy? Clear reference to abortion possible in certain "situation that arises."
13: newborn The person entitled to ...
Questioning:
Missing rights "PERSON" conceived. Forgot the legislature that being is protected by law and has rights from conception and, consequently, you must care since its inception.
ARTICLE 4 - THE RIGHT TO LIFE : The right to life is inherent in human beings. Ensuring their protection, in general, from conception. Abolished the death penalty. Everyone will be protected by the State in its physical and mental integrity, as well as in his honor and reputation. The law regulating freedom of individuals to have their own body, only to scientific or medical purposes.
Article 17: The public health care centers provide ongoing training in sexual and reproductive health from a gender perspective to the staff responsible for the provision of such services.
Questioning:
"gender perspective" is the misleading reference to the release of exercise of homosexuality. This pseudo-scientific proposal makes distinctions that are not really there, saying that sex gender is different from . In the gender perspective these concepts differ as follows:
1. S exo : Refers to the biological differences between male and female, including the apparent diversity of their external genitalia and internal organs, the endocrine peculiarities that sustain them, and differences concerning the role of procreation
2. Gender: is the cultural concept that refers to the social classification into two categories: male and female as meaning construction, which brings together all the psychological, social and cultural aspects of femininity / masculinity being, therefore, the final action of the society for their learning and development.
from this perspective, we can conclude is " society that teaches its members to behave as men or as women and that this behavior changes with the time and place in which they live" thus being sexual behavior, sexuality and entirely subjective exercise.
This proposal violently hit by the objectivity of truth making each one chooses what he likes or what society taught him, denying that every human being is born with sexual characteristics and irreplaceable. You can not separate the male genitals up "penis and testicles" - pardon the expression, taken as a biological description - of his being a man. Same with women. That culture has assigned certain parameters of behavior for men and women in different stages of history, does not mean the possibility of being at odds with the reality that "I was born male" or "I was born a woman."
But although do not say this in the bill, the concept of "gender mainstreaming" is explained and applied in this way, and is supported fervently by many gay associations worldwide. If the Senator does not want to be misunderstood, the better you should change this term.
But if your intention is really what it seems, it falls into a deep contradiction and ignorance of true human dignity that can only be done by the man that it should be, and not one for "free taste "to decide.
Article 19 : The Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare in coordination with the Ministry of Education and Culture and municipalities will be responsible for training and development of agents suitable for:
b) Promote the inclusion curriculum these policies and the content of this program in the public and private schools, also encouraged education and training focused on sexual and reproductive health to teachers.
Article 20: policies a and b mentioned in article above shall include the following contents:
b) complete and accurate information about contraception, their effectiveness and contraindications and proper use for each particular case.
d) Gender equity
Questioning:
If all raised earlier in this analysis is true, worst of all is to be included in the educational curriculum of public and private schools. Children and adolescents will be led to "understand" that was the society that they "won" the genre that they "believe they have" and that from now on they can "decide" the genre that they see fit.
Please! The mirror business no longer makes sense.
Article 23: Failure of the obligations arising from this Act, shall be considered a serious offense for sanctioning purposes, without prejudice to civil or criminal liability may correspond.
Questioning:
And here ends the approach of a liberated sexuality and plain path to legalization of abortion. But if the presentation of the bill came to an end, this article begins the persecution of those who uphold the values \u200b\u200bof a true concept of individual, family and society. All the freedom that was so evoked in the initial articles, is completely obscured by a provision that punishes those who disagree, and here are many: Institutions Pro-Life, Christian churches, people of good will.
Conclusion
can not claim to want freedom alleged sacrificing the inherent dignity of man and woman, family and society. Freedom must be to carry the dignity and look good, not to emulate a game of "dolls" where I can change the clothes and the "gender" to any of the characters at any time. Today is John, but tomorrow is Mary.
The implementation of a law of this kind has no negative consequences measurable results in the formation and maturity of a people. Well, if we want to preserve this violence and abuse, not legalizing what unjust that we will achieve, but through a comprehensive policy covering all aspects of the life of a nation. Not because it has increased the theft means I'll have to legalize it, but we will have to go to the root of the problem.
pregnancies there are many "unwanted" is no reason to propose a bill of this nature. That is not the solution. Why would anyone bother to get the radios much music "garbage" that pollutes young minds and carries sexual debauchery? Why would anyone bother to educate their children telling them to form their consciences in the freedom to choose good instead of evil? Or is that even the evil does not know how to distinguish?
Ciudad del Este, May 9, 2007.
Jorge Miguel Martínez Florentín
Diego Armando López Leiva